Tracking Two Urgent Global Crises: Hunger and Geopolitical Risk

Tracking Two Urgent Global Crises: Hunger and Geopolitical Risk

By Olivia Johnson

In an interconnected world, crises in distant regions ripple here at home. Two global trends currently shaping our shared future are deeply concerning: widespread food insecurity and rising geopolitical risk. Both are rooted in conflict, climate change, and weakened multilateral cooperation. Understanding how they evolve helps Stillwater residents recognize our role in a rapidly changing global landscape.

Growing Hunger, Uneven Gains

Recent State of Food Security and Nutrition reports show global hunger dropped slightly in 2025—but not fast enough. About 7.8% of the world’s people were undernourished, and some 2.1 billion experienced moderate to severe food insecurity. Progress in Central and Southern Asia and Latin America contrasts with stagnation in parts of Africa and worsened conditions in Western Asia.

Meanwhile, the Global Report on Food Crises confirmed two famines simultaneously in 2025—one in Gaza, another in Sudan—for the first time in many years. Conflict-driven disruptions, climate extremes (from droughts to floods), and rising costs for food and fertilizers are driving instability in global food systems.

Slowdown in the Global Economy

Despite some easing in inflation, the worldwide economic outlook is uneven. Growth is expected to slow to about 2.7% in 2026—below pre-pandemic averages—with developing countries and climate-vulnerable economies facing the greatest pressure. Trade remain strained by rising tariffs, disruptions in supply chains, and uncertainty over global rules and partnerships.

Multipolar Power and Rising Risk

The Global Risks Report (2026) highlights geoeconomic confrontation as a growing threat. Countries increasingly use trade, investment, and technology as tools of foreign policy—and the weakening of multilateral institutions can leave global governance fragmented. With geopolitical tensions increasing, the risk of larger conflicts, infrastructure disruption, and sudden supply shocks looms large.

Recent steps, such as new channels for handling AI-related incidents between the U.S. and China, offer hope these risks won’t spiral unchecked. But institutional progress must be paired with bold policy action.

Why This Matters Locally

Global instability has local effects—on fuel prices, grocery bills, and even the reliability of our supply chains. Minnesota’s farmers, for example, both contribute to and depend on global markets for grains, fertilizer, and export pathways. When the world’s system strains, ripple effects show up at home in inflation, export disruptions, and changing climate patterns.

Pathways Forward

  • Advocate for policies that support global food aid and humanitarian programs—even modest contributions can help prevent crisis escalation.
  • Support trade policies that emphasize fairness and stability, helping shield vulnerable populations from sudden shifts.
  • Encourage environmental resilience—both in local agriculture and in global climate action—to reduce exposure to weather extremes.
  • Stay informed, vote, and push for institutional strength—when global systems are robust, countries are less vulnerable to shocks.

These challenges are complex and far-reaching—but not unbeatable. Recognizing them helps us see what’s at stake and where we can act, both as citizens and as members of a community that connects to the wider world.